<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wisden Five hurt my brain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodcricketwicket.co.uk/wisden-five-hurt-my-brain/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodcricketwicket.co.uk/wisden-five-hurt-my-brain</link>
	<description>A cricket blog.  Contains opinions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:52:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://goodcricketwicket.co.uk/wisden-five-hurt-my-brain/comment-page-1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcricketwicket.co.uk/?p=308#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Completely agree. I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll come up with a far more deserving five (well, barring Taylor, she&#039;s great).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll come up with a far more deserving five (well, barring Taylor, she&#8217;s great).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theoldbatsman</title>
		<link>http://goodcricketwicket.co.uk/wisden-five-hurt-my-brain/comment-page-1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>theoldbatsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodcricketwicket.co.uk/?p=308#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this year has shown up the anachronistic selection criteria. It needs to move with the times, and I don&#039;t see why it shouldn&#039;t. Boucher&#039;s feels warranted for his overall career - bit like the best actor oscar that goes to the bloke who should have won for his last film but didn&#039;t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this year has shown up the anachronistic selection criteria. It needs to move with the times, and I don&#8217;t see why it shouldn&#8217;t. Boucher&#8217;s feels warranted for his overall career &#8211; bit like the best actor oscar that goes to the bloke who should have won for his last film but didn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
